R7 250 vs gt 1030
AMD R7 250 vs Nvidia GT 1030
Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed | | 18.2 % | Much faster effective speed.+62% | | 11.2 % | |
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) | | 56.4 fps | Better texture detail.+26% | | 44.7 fps | |
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) | | 31.9 fps | Much faster multi rendering.+44% | | 22.1 fps | |
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) | | 55.7 fps | Hugely faster NBody calculation.+82% | | 30.6 fps | |
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) | | 44.8 fps | Much faster complex splatting.+63% | | 27.5 fps | |
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) | | 64 fps | Much better peak texture detail.+30% | | 49.1 fps | |
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere) | | 35.2 fps | Faster peak multi rendering.+23% | | 28.7 fps | |
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy) | | 59.9 fps | Much faster peak NBody calculation.+79% | | 33.4 fps | |
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) | | 49.1 fps | Much faster peak complex splatting.+43% | | 34.4 fps | |
League of Legends Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max | | 99 fps | +2% | | 97 fps | |
Market Share
Based on 15,002,499 GPUs tested.
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) | | 0.57 % | Hugely higher market share.+470% | | 0.1 % | |
User Rating UBM User Rating | | 70 % | More popular.+21% | | 58 % | |
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming Desktop Workstation CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USB
How it works
- - Download and run UserBenchMark.
- - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- - See speed test results from other users.
- - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
- - Share your opinion by voting.
gpu.userbenchmark.com
Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GT 1030
Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
|
|
More render output processors 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors |
|
|
Higher clock speed 1,227 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | Around 25% higher clock speed |
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz | vs | 4,600 MHz | More than 30% higher effective memory clock speed |
Slightly better PassMark score 2,256 | vs | 1,408 | More than 60% better PassMark score |
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,468 MHz | vs | 1,050 MHz | Around 40% higher turbo clock speed |
Slightly more memory 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory |
Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,150 MHz | More than 30% higher memory clock speed |
Better fire strike factor score 27.03 | vs |
15.71 | More than 70% better fire strike factor score |
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,617 | vs | 912 | More than 75% better PassMark direct compute score |
Lower TDP 30W | vs | 65W | 2.2x lower TDP |
VS VS
gpuboss.com
Сравнение Radeon R7 250E и GeForce GT 1030. Какая лучше?
| |
Декабрь, 2013 | 800 MHz | 2 GB GDDR5 | Май, 2017 | 1.2 GHz | 2 GB GDDR5 |
| |
| |
- Общее сравнение
- Преимущества
- Сравнительные бенчмарки (benchmarks)
Для тестов использовались: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Radeon R7 250E нет данных |
GeForce GT 1030 нет данных |
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 6.1 из 10 |
Работа с графикой
Тесты проводились на: T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor.
Radeon R7 250E 5.7 из 10 |
GeForce GT 1030 5.9 из 10 |
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 7.2 из 10 |
Вычислительная мощность
Тесты проводились на: Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining.
Radeon R7 250E 5.7 из 10 |
GeForce GT 1030 5.8 из 10 |
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 5.9 из 10 |
Производительность из расчета на 1 Вт
Протестировано на: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor, Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining, TDP.
Radeon R7 250E 7.3 из 10 |
GeForce GT 1030 7.7 из 10 |
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 7.9 из 10 |
Шум и мощность
Для тестирования использовались: TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level.
Radeon R7 250E 9.6 из 10 |
GeForce GT 1030 9.9 из 10 |
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 9.6 из 10 |
Общий рейтинг видеокарты
Radeon R7 250E 6.2 из 10 |
GeForce GT 1030 6.5 из 10 |
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 6.8 из 10 |
Преимущества
Чем Radeon R7 250E лучше?
Больше блоков растровых операций 16 | vs | 8 | В два раза больше блоков растровых операций |
Чем GeForce GT 1030 лучше?
Существенно выше тактовая частота 1,227 MHz | vs | 800 MHz |
Приблизительно на 55% выше тактовая частота |
Выше эффективная тактовая частота памяти 6,008 MHz | vs | 4,500 MHz | Приблизительно на 35% выше эффективная тактовая частота памяти |
Выше тактовая частота памяти 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,125 MHz | Приблизительно на 35% выше тактовая частота памяти |
Лучше тест Fire Strike 27.03 | vs | 16.82 | Больше чем на 60% лучше тест Fire Strike |
Ниже энергопотребление 30W | vs | 55W | Больше чем на 45% ниже энергопотребление |
Сравнительные бенчмарки (benchmarks)
Майнинг Биткоина
Radeon R7 250E 98.3 mHash/s |
GeForce GT 1030 139.49 mHash/s |
Распознавание лиц
Radeon R7 250E 21.57 mPixels/s |
GeForce GT 1030 37.36 mPixels/s |
Моделирование поверхности океана
Radeon R7 250E 582.96 frames/s |
GeForce GT 1030 417.91 frames/s |
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0)
Radeon R7 250E 3,357.64 |
GeForce GT 1030 3,359.56 |
Тест Манхэттен (GFXBench 3.0)
Radeon R7 250E 3,602.72 |
GeForce GT 1030 3,719.5 |
Тест Fire Strike
Radeon R7 250E 16.82 |
GeForce GT 1030 27.03 |
Тест Sky Diver
Radeon R7 250E 167.17 |
GeForce GT 1030 229.25 |
Тест Cloud Gate
Radeon R7 250E 12.88 |
GeForce GT 1030 16.35 |
edelmark.ru
Radeon R7 250X vs GeForce GT 1030
No winner declared
Too close to call
Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
|
|
Higher memory bandwidth 104 GB/s | vs | 48.06 GB/s | Around 2.2x higher memory bandwidth |
More render output processors 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors |
Slightly better T-Rex score 3.12 frames/s | vs | 2.13 frames/s | More than 45% better T-Rex score |
|
|
Higher clock speed 1,227 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | Around 25% higher clock speed |
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz | vs | 4,500 MHz | Around 35% higher effective memory clock speed |
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,468 MHz | vs | 1,100 MHz | Around 35% higher turbo clock speed |
Slightly more memory 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory |
Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,150 MHz | More than 30% higher memory clock speed |
Better fire strike factor score 27.03 | vs | 19.17 | More than 40% better fire strike factor score |
Lower TDP 30W | vs | 65W | 2.2x lower TDP |
VS VS
gpuboss.com