R7 250 vs gt 1030


AMD R7 250 vs Nvidia GT 1030

Effective 3D Speed Effective 3D Gaming GPU Speed 18.2 % Much faster effective speed.+62% 11.2 %
Parallax Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 56.4 fps Better texture detail.+26% 44.7 fps
MRender Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 31.9 fps Much faster multi rendering.+44% 22.1 fps
Gravity Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 55.7 fps Hugely faster NBody calculation.+82% 30.6 fps
Splatting Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 44.8 fps Much faster complex splatting.+63% 27.5 fps
Parallax Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 64 fps Much better peak texture detail.+30% 49.1 fps
MRender Render target array GShader (Sphere) 35.2 fps Faster peak multi rendering.+23% 28.7 fps
Gravity NBody particle system (Galaxy) 59.9 fps Much faster peak NBody calculation.+79% 33.4 fps
Splatting Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 49.1 fps Much faster peak complex splatting.+43% 34.4 fps
League of Legends Avg. FPS @ 1080p on Max 99 fps +2% 97 fps

Market Share

Based on 15,002,499 GPUs tested.
Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) 0.57 % Hugely higher market share.+470% 0.1 %
User Rating UBM User Rating 70 % More popular.+21% 58 %
How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming Desktop Workstation CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USB
How it works
  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

gpu.userbenchmark.com

Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GT 1030

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

GPUBoss Winner

More render output processors Higher clock speed Higher effective memory clock speed Slightly better PassMark score Significantly higher turbo clock speed Slightly more memory Higher memory clock speed Better fire strike factor score Better PassMark direct compute score Lower TDP
16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
1,227 MHz vs 1,000 MHz Around 25% higher clock speed
6,008 MHz vs 4,600 MHz More than 30% higher effective memory clock speed
2,256 vs 1,408 More than 60% better PassMark score
1,468 MHz vs 1,050 MHz Around 40% higher turbo clock speed
2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
1,502 MHz vs 1,150 MHz More than 30% higher memory clock speed
27.03 vs 15.71 More than 70% better fire strike factor score
1,617 vs 912 More than 75% better PassMark direct compute score
30W vs 65W 2.2x lower TDP
VS VS

gpuboss.com

Сравнение Radeon R7 250E и GeForce GT 1030. Какая лучше?

Декабрь, 2013 | 800 MHz | 2 GB GDDR5 Май, 2017 | 1.2 GHz | 2 GB GDDR5
  • Общее сравнение
  • Преимущества
  • Сравнительные бенчмарки (benchmarks)

Для тестов использовались: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.

Radeon R7 250E GeForce GT 1030 GeForce GTX 750 Ti
нет данных
нет данных
6.1 из 10

Работа с графикой

Тесты проводились на: T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor.

Radeon R7 250E GeForce GT 1030 GeForce GTX 750 Ti
5.7 из 10
5.9 из 10
7.2 из 10

Вычислительная мощность

Тесты проводились на: Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining.

Radeon R7 250E GeForce GT 1030 GeForce GTX 750 Ti
5.7 из 10
5.8 из 10
5.9 из 10

Производительность из расчета на 1 Вт

Протестировано на: Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite, Crysis 2, Crysis 3, Dirt3, FarCry 3, Hitman: Absolution, Metro: Last Light, Thief, Alien: Isolation, Anno 2070, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Diablo III, Dirt Rally, Dragon Age: Inquisition, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, FIFA 15, FIFA 16, GRID Autosport, Grand Theft Auto V, Sleeping Dogs, Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor, Fire Strike Factor, Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation, Particle Simulation, Video Composition, Bitcoin Mining, TDP.

Radeon R7 250E GeForce GT 1030 GeForce GTX 750 Ti
7.3 из 10
7.7 из 10
7.9 из 10

Шум и мощность

Для тестирования использовались: TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level.

Radeon R7 250E GeForce GT 1030 GeForce GTX 750 Ti
9.6 из 10
9.9 из 10
9.6 из 10

Общий рейтинг видеокарты

Radeon R7 250E GeForce GT 1030 GeForce GTX 750 Ti
6.2 из 10
6.5 из 10
6.8 из 10

Преимущества

Чем Radeon R7 250E лучше?

Больше блоков растровых операций
16 vs 8 В два раза больше блоков растровых операций

Чем GeForce GT 1030 лучше?

Существенно выше тактовая частота Выше эффективная тактовая частота памяти Выше тактовая частота памяти Лучше тест Fire Strike Ниже энергопотребление
1,227 MHz vs 800 MHz Приблизительно на 55% выше тактовая частота
6,008 MHz vs 4,500 MHz Приблизительно на 35% выше эффективная тактовая частота памяти
1,502 MHz vs 1,125 MHz Приблизительно на 35% выше тактовая частота памяти
27.03 vs 16.82 Больше чем на 60% лучше тест Fire Strike
30W vs 55W Больше чем на 45% ниже энергопотребление

Сравнительные бенчмарки (benchmarks)

Майнинг Биткоина

Radeon R7 250E GeForce GT 1030
98.3 mHash/s
139.49 mHash/s

Распознавание лиц

Radeon R7 250E GeForce GT 1030
21.57 mPixels/s
37.36 mPixels/s

Моделирование поверхности океана

Radeon R7 250E GeForce GT 1030
582.96 frames/s
417.91 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0)

Radeon R7 250E GeForce GT 1030
3,357.64
3,359.56

Тест Манхэттен (GFXBench 3.0)

Radeon R7 250E GeForce GT 1030
3,602.72
3,719.5

Тест Fire Strike

Radeon R7 250E GeForce GT 1030
16.82
27.03

Тест Sky Diver

Radeon R7 250E GeForce GT 1030
167.17
229.25

Тест Cloud Gate

Radeon R7 250E GeForce GT 1030
12.88
16.35

edelmark.ru

Radeon R7 250X vs GeForce GT 1030

No winner declared

Too close to call

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
Higher memory bandwidth More render output processors Slightly better T-Rex score Higher clock speed Higher effective memory clock speed Significantly higher turbo clock speed Slightly more memory Higher memory clock speed Better fire strike factor score Lower TDP
104 GB/s vs 48.06 GB/s Around 2.2x higher memory bandwidth
16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
3.12 frames/s vs 2.13 frames/s More than 45% better T-Rex score
1,227 MHz vs 1,000 MHz Around 25% higher clock speed
6,008 MHz vs 4,500 MHz Around 35% higher effective memory clock speed
1,468 MHz vs 1,100 MHz Around 35% higher turbo clock speed
2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
1,502 MHz vs 1,150 MHz More than 30% higher memory clock speed
27.03 vs 19.17 More than 40% better fire strike factor score
30W vs 65W 2.2x lower TDP
VS VS

gpuboss.com


Смотрите также