I5 7300hq vs i7 7700hq
Intel Core i5-7300HQ vs i7-7700HQ
| Gaming 67% | Desktop 68% |
| Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed | 67.4 % | +4% | 64.6 % |
| SC Mixed Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed | 95.6 Pts | Slightly faster single-core speed.+5% | 90.9 Pts | |||
| QC Mixed Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed | 329 Pts | 332 Pts | +1% | |||
| MC Mixed Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed | 499 Pts | Much faster multi-core speed.+46% | 342 Pts |
| SC Mixed OC Single Core Mixed Speed | 114 Pts | Slightly faster OC single-core speed.+8% | 106 Pts | |||
| QC Mixed OC Quad Core Mixed Speed | 405 Pts | Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.+7% | 378 Pts | |||
| MC Mixed OC Multi Core Mixed Speed | 568 Pts | Much faster OC multi-core speed.+49% | 380 Pts |
Market Share
Based on 15,113,053 CPUs tested.| Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) | 1.8 % | Hugely higher market share.+137% | 0.76 % | |||
| User Rating UBM User Rating | 65 % | Slightly more popular.+7% | 61 % |
| Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency | 1.10 GHz | 1.00 GHz | ||||
| Hyper-Threading Tech Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology ‡ | Yes | No | ||||
| TSX-NI Intel® TSX-NI | No | Yes | ||||
| More specs » | More specs » |
ADVERTISEMENT
Great laptop CPU. Can run stuff really smooth without any problem, its a great option for a 7th gen processor, but if you can afford it, go with a 8th generation processor. [Jul '18 landsec]
MORE DETAILS
best buy for a laptop, performance [Jun '18 ViceCity]
MORE DETAILS
Systems with these CPUs
Top Builds that include these CPUs
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming Desktop Workstation CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USBHow it works
- - Download and run UserBenchMark.
- - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- - See speed test results from other users.
- - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
- - Share your opinion by voting.
cpu.userbenchmark.com
Intel Core i7-7700HQ или Intel Core i5-7300HQ
| Core i7-7700HQ | Core i5-7300HQ | |
| АрхитектураКодовое название поколения микроархитектуры. | Kaby Lake | Kaby Lake |
| ЦенаСтоимость нового процессора в вашем городе. Если CPU старый, вам будут показаны актуальные аналоги, либо вы можете поискать модель на Aliexpress, Ebay и Amazon. | ||
| Дата выпускаМесяц и год появления процессора. | 05-2017 | 06-2017 |
| ЯдерКоличество физических ядер. | 4 | 4 |
| ПотокиКоличество потоков. Количество логических ядер процессора, которые видит операционная система. | 8 | 4 |
| Базовая частотаМаксимальная каждого ядра процессора в обычном режиме работы. От неё зависит производительность в однопоточных и многопоточных приложениях, играх. Важно помнить, что скорость и частота напрямую не связаны. Например, новый процессор на меньшей частоте может быть быстрее, чем старый на большей. | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Частота турбо-режимаМаксимальная частота одного ядра процессора в турбо-режиме. Производители дали возможность процессору самостоятельно повышать частоту одного или нескольких ядер под сильной нагрузкой, благодаря чему скорость работы повышается. Сильно влияет на скорость в играх и приложениях, требовательных к частоте CPU. | 3.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Объем кэша L3Кэш третьего уровня работает буфером между оперативной памятью компьютера и кэшем 2 уровня процессора. Используется всеми ядрами, от объёма зависит скорость обработки информациию. | 6 Мбайт | 6 Мбайт |
| ТехпроцессТехнологический процесс производства, измеряется в нанометрах. Чем меньше техпроцесс, тем совершеннее технология, ниже тепловыделение и энергопотребление. | 14 нм | 14 нм |
| Максимальный TDPThermal Design Power - показатель, определяющий максимальное тепловыделение. Кулер или водяная система охлаждения должны быть рассчитаны на равное или большее значение. Помните, что с разгоном TDP значительно растёт. | 45 Вт | 45 Вт |
| Single-Core тестыПроизводительность одного ядра в тестах с арифметическими операциями с целыми числами и числами с плавающей точкой. Влияет на отзывчивость системы, скорость работы однопоточных приложений и игр. | ||
| Quad-Core тестыПроизводительность четырёх ядер (если у процессора меньше ядер, то задействуется максимальное число потоков) в тестах с арифметическими операциями с целыми числами и числами с плавающей точкой. | ||
| Multi-Core тестыПроизводительность всех ядер и потоков в тестах с арифметическими операциями с целыми числами и числами с плавающей точкой. Влияет на производительность системы в многопоточных играх и приложениях. |
| Скорость в играх Производительность в играх и подобных приложениях, согласно нашим тестам. Наибольшее влияние на результат оказывает производительность 4 ядер, если они есть, и производительность на 1 ядро, поскольку большинство игр полноценно используют не более 4 ядер. | ||
| Скорость в офисном использовании Производительность в повседневной работе, например, браузерах и офисных программах. Наибольшее влияние на результат оказывает производительность 1 ядра, поскольку большинство приложений использует лишь одно, игнорируя остальные. | ||
| Скорость в тяжёлых приложениях Производительность в рендеринге, кодировании видео, работе с виртуальными машинами и базами данных. Наибольшее влияние на результат оказывает производительность всех ядер и их количество, поскольку большинство профессиональных приложений охотно используют все ядра и соответственно увеличивают скорость работы. |
- В среднем, производительность в играх лучше на 2%.
- Скорость работы в офисных приложениях и браузерах больше на 4%.
- В сложных многопоточных приложениях быстрее и превосходит на 4%.
- Количество потоков больше на 4.
- Базовая частота выше на 0.3 GHz.
- Цены на новые процессоры примерно равны.
- Число физических ядер равно.
benchmarkdb.ru
Intel Core i5-7300HQ vs i7-7700K
| Gaming 95% | Desktop 96% | Workstation 70% |
| Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed | 94.7 % | Much faster effective speed.+47% | 64.6 % |
| SC Mixed Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed | 135 Pts | Much faster single-core speed.+49% | 90.9 Pts | |||
| QC Mixed Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed | 460 Pts | Much faster quad-core speed.+39% | 332 Pts | |||
| MC Mixed Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed | 711 Pts | Hugely faster multi-core speed.+108% | 342 Pts |
| SC Mixed OC Single Core Mixed Speed | 152 Pts | Much faster OC single-core speed.+43% | 106 Pts | |||
| QC Mixed OC Quad Core Mixed Speed | 555 Pts | Much faster OC quad-core speed.+47% | 378 Pts | |||
| MC Mixed OC Multi Core Mixed Speed | 811 Pts | Hugely faster OC multi-core speed.+113% | 380 Pts |
Market Share
Based on 15,113,053 CPUs tested.| Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days) | 1.8 % | Hugely higher market share.+137% | 0.76 % | |||
| User Rating UBM User Rating | 128 % | Hugely more popular.+110% | 61 % |
| Cache Cache | 8 MB | 6 MB | ||||
| Recommended Price Recommended Customer Price | $339.00 - $350.00 | N/A | ||||
| Memory Types Memory Types | DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133, DDR3L-1600 | ||||
| Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency | 1.15 GHz | 1.00 GHz | ||||
| Package Size Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 42mm x 28mm | ||||
| Hyper-Threading Tech Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology ‡ | Yes | No | ||||
| More specs » | More specs » |
ADVERTISEMENT
The Core i7-7700K is Intel’s flagship Kaby Lake based CPU which is reported to have the same IPC as its predecessor, Skylake. Comparing the 7700K and 6700K shows that both average effective speed and peak overclocked speed are up by 7%. Most of the increase in average effective speed is explained by the 5% boost in base clocks from 4.0 to 4.2 GHz. The improved peak lab speed is attributable to a combination of better overclocking capacity and improvements in Intel’s speedshift technology which make the 7700K slightly more responsive. Kaby Lake also has marginally better HD 630 integrated graphics. The i7-7700K is priced similarly to the i7-6700K so for top end gaming and workstation builds, the 7700K is the clear choice for 2017. AMD’s Ryzen will release later this year so things could change at that time. [Jan '17 CPUPro]
MORE DETAILS
best buy for a laptop, performance [Jun '18 ViceCity]
MORE DETAILS
Systems with these CPUs
Top Builds that include these CPUs
ADVERTISEMENT
Group Test Results
- Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
- Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
- Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.
UserBenchmark of the month
Gaming Desktop Workstation CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USBHow it works
- - Download and run UserBenchMark.
- - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
- - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
- - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
- - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
- - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
- - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
- - See speed test results from other users.
- - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
- - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
- - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
- - Share your opinion by voting.
cpu.userbenchmark.com
Intel Core i5-7300HQ vs Intel Core i7-7700HQ – which one is better for gaming and for work?
When it comes to gaming notebooks, the most popular processors used are the Intel Core i5-7300HQ and the Core i7-7700HQ. They are beloved by manufacturers for the good performance and efficiency of the latest 7th Kaby Lake generation. There are better options than these two like the unlocked HK models but casual gamers usually tend to save some money and don’t opt for some super crazy specs on notebooks.
They also provide more than enough horsepower to execute any office task and even rendering is going to be an ease to some extent.
As expected the mid-range i5-7300HQ is far more affordable than the high-end i7-7700HQ but is there enough of a difference between them? Isn’t it better to go for a better graphics card than for the higher class processor? In this article, we will see how the two chips stack to each other and what’s the actual difference in performance.
You can check out the available configuration of the Lenovo Legion Y520 over here: Buy from Amazon.com
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
The Core i5-7300HQ is the go-to processor for budget gaming notebooks. One of the best in this class is the Lenovo Y520 which can be configurated with both of the compared processors.
The Core i5-7300HQ is part of the 7th generation Kaby Lake processors. It is the direct successor to the Core i5-6300HQ. Compared to its predecessor it runs at 200 MHz higher base frequency (2.5 GHz) and boosts up to 3.5 GHz (300 MHz more than before). If offers 6 MB of L2 cache and is rated at 45W TDP. The Core i5-7300HQ is a quad-core processor but lacks the Hyper-Threading technology of the Core i7-7700HQ which would result in multi-threaded performance.
The integrated GPU is the Intel HD Graphics 630 ranging from 350 MHz to 1.0 GHz. It features 24 Execution Units (EUs).
The chip supports DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133, and DDR3L-1600 RAM.
You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/
You can find more detailed information about the CPU and its price over here: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i5-7300hq/
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
The Core i7-7700HQ is the most common processors found in gaming notebooks from the budget all the way up to the upper mid-class. It provides excellent performance and it is suitable for all kinds of work.
Part of the 7th generation Kaby Lake, the Core i7-7700HQ steps in where the Core i7-6700HQ left us. Just like the i5-7300HQ, the new version of the Core i7 has 200 MHz higher base clock and 300 MHz higher Turbo Boost frequency – 2.80 GHz and 3.80 GHz respectively. It also features 6 MB of L2 cache and 45W TDP rating but differs from the i5-7300HQ by the addition of Hyper-Threading. The Core i7-7700HQ is a four core/eight thread processor.
It features the same iGPU as the Core i5-7300HQ – Intel HD Graphics 630 but this time with a slightly higher maximum frequency of 1.10 GHz.
The chip supports DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133, and DDR3L-1600 RAM.
You can browse through our top CPUs ranking: http://laptopmedia.com/top-laptop-cpu-ranking/
You can find more detailed information about the CPU and its price over here: http://laptopmedia.com/processor/intel-core-i7-7700hq/
Comparison
Putting the two chips side by side we see quite a few similarities. They both are created using the 14 nm FinFET manufacturing process and are part of the 7th generation Intel Core processors. They both have 6 MB of SmartCache (L2) and 45W TDP as well as 100°C maximum operating temperature. The socket they fit is the FCBGA1440. They also feature the same iGPU but its maximum frequency is a bit higher on the Core i7-7700HQ, however, this won’t make a difference in performance especially when using an external graphics card.
The difference is when it comes to core count and clock speeds. To be more precise, both models have the same amount of physical cores but the Core i7-7700HQ has Intel’s Hyper-Threading technology enabled which the Core i5-7300HQ lacks. This way it doubles the effective threads – eight vs four respectively. To be fair, this won’t make a big of a difference during gaming. The more threads will help in heavy multitasking, rendering, and other multi-threaded tasks. We will also see a difference in benchmarks some of which are synthetic.
Both the base and Turbo frequencies of the Core i7-7700HQ are 300 MHz higher compared to its rival – 2.80 vs 2.50 GHz and 3.80 vs 3.50 GHz respectively.
A lot of gaming laptops are sold in configurations with both of the compared processors and sometimes the price gap is a couple hundred dollars. In such a case, you might ask yourself is it worth the extra money? This is the case with one of the most popular budget gaming notebooks at the moment – the Lenovo Legion Y520 which we are using four our benchmarks. We will try to answer your questions through several test results.
For work?
Here are а couple of synthetic benchmarks we ran and results from our Photoshop test which represents real-world performance.
As you can see, the Hyper-Threaded Core i7-7700HQ is up to 40% better in synthetic benchmarks such as Novabench and Cinebench 11. It also finished our Photoshop preset rendering for three seconds less than the Core i5-7300HQ which represents real-world scenario. Three seconds is not too much so even for basic photo and video editing you won’t see big of a difference between the two chips, however, keep in mind that this performance gap will widen when they encounter bigger obstacles.
What about gaming?
We can assure you that if there is any difference in the frame rates it will be a single digit number probably no more than 1-5%. This is due to the fact that gaming performance depends more on the graphics card rather than the CPU and both processors are powerful enough to not bottleneck powerful graphics cards like the GTX 1080. They both have high frequencies and four physical cores are plenty enough for most every modern game so even the Core i5-7300HQ which lacks Hyper-Threading performs well. The additional threads available on the Core i7-7700HQ will be useful in heavy multitasking and CPU-heavy processes.
Verdict
To sum things up, we could say that both the Core i5-7300HQ and Core i7-7700HQ are two very capable processors. Choosing between them depends on your needs. If you are interested only in gaming and you don’t have too much money to spend we would advise getting the Core i5-7300HQ as the GPU is more important. A great thing to do would be to save for a better GPU while remaining with a Core i5-7300HQ.
The Hyper-Threading technology paired with higher clock speeds makes the Core i7-7700HQ the better processor if we don’t consider price and specific needs. As we already said, the Core i5-7300HQ is enough for most gamers but the i7-7700HQ will surely be preferred for heavy multitasking, photo editing, and video rendering. The i7-7700HQ will make your notebook a pretty solid all-rounder suitable for both work and play.
Overall, if you have the extra money getting the Core i7-7700HQ is always a good idea but you don’t really need it if you won’t push the Core i5-7300HQ to its limits.
You can check out the available configuration of the Lenovo Legion Y520 over here: Buy from Amazon.com
laptopmedia.com
